Like I said it's not rocket science for anyone with the least bit of technical know how, and anyone without any technical know how will have it installed by a dealer anyway. A proper instruction guide can guide even the most inept around possible issues such as mounting antennas behind radar blocking grilles and such. Comparing this to a doctor is really insulting, my 7 year old could most likely install a CI RD. But objectively, when viewed as a complete package (radar and laser) two of them protect better than the other one does.Ĭomparing a doctor performing spine surgery is a FAR cry from installing something as simple as a CI system which consists mainly of finding a switched power in the fusebox, a ground and otherwise just running wires. You probably won't get a ticket with any of them, statistically speaking. None of these three systems are "bad" choices, compared to cheaper alternatives. It just depends on what your priorities are. Some will prefer Escort, some will prefer NetRadar, and some will prefer Radenso. There is a choice for everyone in this market. As for support, well, give their support department a call and try it for yourself. They had the smallest radar related booth at SEMA, and are currently suing their biggest two competitors. Radenso is owned by the founder of Escort and has an excellent track record of support.Įscort has had 6 CEOs in 8 years and is owned by the bank. On the support side of things, Netradar and AL Priority are stable, successful businesses that have an excellent track record of support. Both units boast MRCD capability, but the RC Ms is hardware based which means it scan scan down lower in the K band spectrum. The NetRadar beats the RC M in KA sensitivity by a couple decibles, but lacks in false alert filtering and a standalone display with lockouts. It is the only system which is "standalone" that boasts AL Priority integration. The RC M is a simpler, stand-alone system that has built-in lockout abilities and the best false alert filtering on the market. The Netradar and RC M both benefit from AL Priority integration. Personally, I would not ever spend a few grand on a system and not purchase the best available, so the proprietary nature of the radar/laser Escort side is a non-starter for me.
Many of my dealers, before they sold Radenso, would sell the customer a Max 360 radar, throw away the laser portion, and then install a stand-alone AL Priority. The Escort laser side of things is poor compared to the AL Priority. Most non-enthusiasts would probably prefer an Escort-style unit. But it lacks having a dedicated display for the average user. And you know it will have more firmware updates and is a much more customer-focused product. It also has limited MRCD capabilities, which the Escort does not. The Netradar DSP is a top-notch antenna as far as sensitivity goes, and if the user is a very technical one can be preferred to the Escort unit. However, it lacks MRCD which is a major oversight. It has equivalent range with the DSP and RC M, worse filtering than the RC M, and arguably better ergonomics. The Max360CI radar unit is their only radar product I consider competitive and not existentially flawed. The Escort products you have enjoyed in the past were developed when the company was owned by Radenso's current majority owner (alongside myself).
0 kommentar(er)
